[obol] Post storm report Coos Cty - The real story

[Tim Rodenkirk]

I agree, it must be all that water.

Tim
--- DJ Lauten and KACastelein <deweysage at verizon.net>
wrote:

> I contacted Dr. Science to ask a few important
> questions.
> 
> 1) Does FoxSparrow in fact have science on his side?
>  Dr. Science 
> reports that facts are not always what they seem to
> be.  While a fact 
> may in fact be a fact, if one blathers enough
> nonsense, soon the 
> nonsense becomes a fact, and then, facts are not
> what they seem to be.  
> For an example, search on The White House.
> 
> 2) Is it factually correct that there are more than
> one T. Rodenkirks, 
> and they are common?   Dr. Science reports that in
> fact, under the right 
> conditions, Rodenkirks are quite common.   They tend
> to come out during 
> sunny weather, are fairly common in the rain, tend
> to like it hot and 
> dry, but windy conditions due in fact bring them
> into the open, they are 
> bit less common in fog, but that may be a fact of
> visibility, and they 
> will and do travel immense distances at speeds that
> are in fact not 
> quite close to that of light because in fact we all
> know that they 
> cannot possible travel the speed of light because
> then in fact we 
> probably would not be able to see them.  One fact is
> certainly true, 
> during pre-CBC conditions, Rodenkirks, especially in
> Coos Cty, are 
> downright common.  They may be wintering, which CBC
> data will certainly 
> prove.
> 
> 3) Can it be factually stated that R Namitz's are
> becoming more common, 
> and they may be in competition with Rodenkirks to
> divide and conquer?  
> Dr. Science reports that while the evidence for
> Rodenkirks is rather 
> good, with numerous pictures that suggest more than
> one individual, but 
> no pictures yet of more than one Rodenkirk in one
> location at once, 
> pictures of Namitz are a bit harder to come by.  In
> fact, it has been 
> reported that Namitz's have been seen repeatedly
> BEHIND the camera, 
> something a Rodenkirk would never be seen
> attempting.  Dr. Science 
> reports that Rodenkirks are extremely shy about
> being BEHIND the camera, 
> and that they flush at the thought of even getting
> BEHIND one.  One the 
> other hand, Namitz has been repeatedly seen behind
> these incredible 
> human inventions, often with starkly beautiful
> results.  However, 
> Namitzs (or is it Namitz's, one of those funny
> spelling things we find 
> amongst names often given to creatures by science)
> may be very wary when 
> in front of the lens, and have been noted acting a
> bit odd when the lens 
> is pointed at them, as if something or someone may
> shoot it. 
> 
> Finally Dr Science notes that there is data still to
> collect to prove or 
> disprove these facts.  If you are armed with a
> camera, be sure at all 
> times to be ready to establish, by photo and
> therefore fact, that you 
> have seen more than one Rodenkirk at once, or any
> Namitz at all.  A 
> photo speaks a thousand words.
> 
> Yes, it's a fact, things are a little nuts in Coos. 
> 
> Cheers
> Dave Lauten
> 
> 
> FoxSparrows at aol.com wrote:
> 
> > Remember... it is a well-established fact that 
> MORE THAN ONE T. 
> > RODENKIRK is known to exist. I have published
> PHOTOGRAPHIC PROOF in 
> > OREGON BURDS, The Jornal of Oregon Field
> Ornithoptery. You have 
> > laughed in the past, but, just like the Loch Ness
> Monster, the 
> > Rational Birder, and Sasquatch.... THEY EXIST (and
> may be coming to 
> > your town)! Call me a Loony if you want... I have
> science on my side!
> >  
> > In a message dated 12/4/2007 1:33:17 P.M. Pacific
> Standard Time, 
> > deweysage at verizon.net writes:
> >
> >     This species is more common than the
> >     Russ Namitzs (although the latter is becoming
> quite common too, so
> >     obvious there has been a bit of a change in
> distribution), frequently
> >     noted on any day or month as one birds around
> Coos Bay.  So, no
> >     surprise
> >     to find this common creature.  With the
> Rodenkirk were two
> >     oldsquaws. 
> >     Er, um, excuse me, I mean two LONG-TAILED
> DUCKS were just off the
> >     point,
> >     not far from the Rodenkirk. 
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Check out AOL Money & Finance's list of the
> hottest products 
> >
>
<http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001>
> 
> > and top money wasters 
> >
>
<http://money.aol.com/top5/general/ways-you-are-wasting-money?NCID=aoltop00030000000002>
> 
> > of 2007.
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> obol mailing list
> obol at lists.oregonstate.edu
> http://lists.oregonstate.edu/mailman/listinfo/obol
> 
> To unsubscribe, send a message to:
> obol-leave at lists.oregonstate.edu.



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping